Comments on: Best Women’s Erotica 2009 https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/ ..but mostly sex Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:40:43 +0000 hourly 1 By: For Your Nymphomation Adult Toybox - of Sex and Love https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-53311 Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:01:54 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-53311 […] Best Women’s Erotica Book – 2009 […]

]]> By: Trix https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-14348 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:01:19 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-14348 I’m one of those gals who likes m/m stories best, and so it always annoys me when “women’s erotica” volumes don’t include any of those…I always figure that if a woman likes to read it, it counts!

]]> By: The Adventurous Couple’s Guide to Sex Toys Review + Giveaway » of Sex and Love https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-11388 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:59:00 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-11388 […] Blue’s blog on and off for years without reading anything of hers in print (well, I did read books that she’s edited). Now, I can add that to my to-done list, which is my version of a bucket list — only I add […]

]]> By: asha pena https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-1638 Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:22:38 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-1638 Thank you so Much for your review. I love to read erotice books but it sound like this is a bad on. I really enjoyed “Between the Sheets” by p.J. Mellor and “The Year of Living Shamelessly” by Susanna Carr.

]]> By: Adriana https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-1636 Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:44:44 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-1636 In reply to Juliettia.

I definitely preferred 5 Minute Erotica.

]]> By: Juliettia https://ofsexandlove.com/best-womens-erotica-2009/#comment-1634 Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:56:37 +0000 http://ofsexandlove.com/?p=2222#comment-1634 I’m glad I didn’t pick this up then. The cover is what intrigued me, but I wanted to read a few reviews for it first. Looks like it would have been a waste of money for me.

]]>