I wouldn’t be so harsh about a blog comment. Even my review has typos — oops.

“by a woman who loves woman…” <~This is all I need to know. No amount of editing can fix inherently poor writing capability that suggests the author stopped paying attention in Language Arts somewhere in the 7th grade. I often see journalists write "a women" as well, and I do complain to editors about it. Somebody is living their white privilege and had some connections to be where they are! Poorly written erotica is free on literotica.com, so naturally one would think a published work as having risen above. I think this is what rubs you wrong, Adriana. You could have read it for free elsewhere if she were anyone else.

This is why I was so hesitant to write this review. Obviously, your experiences and preferences for types of women, stories and writing differ from mine, but I also found an inherent lack of variation and writing experience to be distracting. Do I have something against small, firm breasts? By default? No. They’re great. I do, however, get sick of seeing the same repetitive description/through process from characters. Perhaps if this was billed as “inspired by true experiences,” my opinion would differ. In fact, accurate branding would be better suited and would have led to be not reading it at all because I wouldn’t have thought it might be up my alley.

Thank you for stopping by and commenting, Elisabeth. I hope my review, although harsh, can help you in the future.