Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight For Sex Workers Rights

June 6th, 2019

Not two days ago I had an elegant summary for Revolting Prostitutes bouncing around my head. It was the perfect segue into a review, and I’ve gone and lost it. That’s what I get, I suppose, for waiting to write it down. And I really waited far too long to even start writing this review because my memory is not hazy. Good thing Revolting Prostitutes leaves an impact.

Just what impact is it?

This book makes the argument that sex workers’ rights are women’ rights are sex workers’ rights and human rights by extension, and because of this should not be excluded as feminists or members of society. Juno Mac and Molly Smith do this by taking a hard look at the reality of sex work: why people do it, how it can be done safely, whether it’s feminist, how sex work and sex trafficking differ, and how society can protect some of its most at-risk members. Mac and Smith examine laws about sex work around the world to make their ultimate argument that in a world where some people must resort to sex work to make money, decriminalizing and not legalizing sex work is the only way to protect those people. Furthermore, they illustrate how pivotal sex workers have been when it comes to the fight for women’s rights and why excluding them from feminist arguments is not just unethical but grossly ignorant.

Revolting Prostitutes takes us through Nevada where just a few brothels operate legally toward Sweden where it examines the Scandinavian model of criminalization to the UK and, finally, to New Zealand. It is here where sex work has been decriminalized, and sex workers have a voice when it comes to laws that would affect them.

The feminism promoted in Revolting Prostitutes is not white feminism. Even though the authors admit to their own privilege (being cisgender, white and middle class), they examine the issues surrounding sex workers, many of whom are working class or people of color, through and intersectional lens. Among the topics addressed in these pages is immigration, which makes Revolting Prostitutes seem especially timely to this American.

Aside from teaching the reader what they don’t know about sex work, the authors smash longheld myths about sex work, including the idea that legalization is the best route. I once viewed sex work similar to marijuana and fell into the camp of “legalize sex work so it can be taxed.” But this book thoughtfully points out that legalization offers no protections for sex workers when one of the main dangers they face is from the police. In a world where that wasn’t the case, they argue, legalization may be an option. But for now, it remains out of reach.

It is far from the only myth torn apart in these pages. While so many people who argue for sex worker’s rights paint the picture of the “Happy Hooker,” you will not see that imagery in Revolting Prostitutes. This book is more frank than that. The authors would not paint with such broad strokes. Instead, they write honestly about how sex is neither good nor bad by definition, and neither is sex work or people, for that matter. These things can be positive or negative, health or otherwise. And when it comes to people, they are people who deserve our care faults and all. This is why the authors write candidly about the damage done to sex workers by so-called carceral feminists who want brothels shut down, and sex workers deported even if doing so will result in the greater abuse and potentially death of those sex workers.

When disproving these ideologies, Juno and Moll never take the easy way out by simply claiming them false. time after time they are prepared to say it’s more complicated than that and explain why. For example, when they touch on whether sex work is a bad thing because some sex works do not enjoy their jobs or because sex workers sell their bodies, the authors are quick to point out that there are many grueling jobs that do not bring joy to those who perform them. Those workers simply need the money. They trade their time and, yes, their bodies, to jobs that take a toll day in and day out. Revolting Prostitutes breaks down the issues one by one into palatable bites like that, and more.

Those people who have a strict anti-sex work stance would likely not enjoy or agree with Revolting Prostitutes. I’d hope that some people who are on the fence or who have not thought deeply about these issues might find themselves swayed by the book, however. Furthermore, the authors are clearly proponents of socialized elements of society. In this way, Revolting Prostitutes look as society as a whole using sex workers as a litmus test. A society that lacks support will surely fail this marginalized group of people. Readers who disagree with a government supporting its people through socialized healthcare and similar programs will surely balk at statements within the pages.

As for me, I am neither of those types of people. I found the arguments thoughtful and eye-opening. With the words they’ve written, Mac and Smith do an excellent job bringing sex workers, and they work they do from the other. They humanize people that are all too often written off, ignored, and otherwise erased. I am all too happy to recommend Revolting Prostitutes as long as society overlooks sex workers. I am angered that this book needs to exist but glad that it does. I hope that people and governments can learn from words like these and the people who are willing to write and speak them. Perhaps reality could be not quite so harsh for sex workers and women as a whole.

Until then, I can only lend my support to the revolt.

1 Comment


FOSTA/SESTA Hurts the Very People It’s Intended to Protect

March 11th, 2019

Today’s guest post is about a topic that I’ve discussed on Twitter and Facebook but not here on my blog. My sex educator peers and the sex workers who run in adjacent circles are well aware of the costs of SESTA/FOSTA and similar policies in other locales. However, not everyone is. The following explains a bit more.

Sex work is a controversial topic. Some have moral and religious objections to the practice, while others view it as a normal way to make a living. Due to the nature of the vocation, there is risk of exploitation. Pimps manipulate the young and vulnerable into the practice against their will. They are often separated from their families and placed in dangerous situations. There is a high risk of:

  • Emotional abuse
  • Violence
  • Drug use to control depression
  • Death

As a society, we need to put measures in place to detect and stop sex trafficking.

On the other hand, some people voluntarily ent er the sex industry. Contrary to popular belief, it isn’t because they are from broken homes, or addicted to drugs. Some enjoy the perceived freedom, flexibility and relatively high earnings per hour rate of sex work. As of writing, the UK minimum wage is £7.81 an hour. An independent sex worker can expect to make £100 an hour in most cities. Therefore, it can be a rational choice.

The United States designed the FOSTA-SESTA bills in order to stamp out sex trafficking. FOSTA stands for ‘Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act’. SESTA stands for ’Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act’. Interestingly, there is no evidence that sex workers were consulted while creating this bill. Essentially, the United States government had meetings and decided what they thought was the best way to eradicate sex trafficking. It is difficult to solve a problem if you don’t know the root cause and complexities. In the end, they decided that the internet was a driver of sex trafficking. As a result, social media sites will be criminally responsible for content deemed to be promoting sex trafficking.

Let’s cross back over the pond for a second. It is difficult to get data on sex work because there is no national body. However, we use certain data to extrapolate from. Between 2002 to date, the percentage of soliciting of prostitution offenses has sharply declined. Interestingly, there is a positive correlation between internet access and the decline of prostitution. Could it be that those who might have been vulnerable to sex trafficking are now working independently in safe and controlled environments?

Since 1996, social media site operators were protected under ‘Safe Harbor’ in the United States. It stated, “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” This meant that users were responsible for their activities. The FOSTA-SESTA bills make internet service providers and platforms responsible for what their users post. In response, top social media sites closed certain sections of their site. For example, Craiglist no longer has a personals section.

Interestingly, UK politicians were planning a version of FOSTA-SESTA. This is likely to have the opposite effect. Instead of protecting sex workers, it will drive it further underground. Ironically, instead of limiting sex trafficking, it will provide the environment for it to flourish. Hypothetically, the government will be able to use carefully chosen statistics to show that the incidences of prostitution has reduced. Would it have reduced or simply driven underground? Out of sight, out of mind.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Prostitution and the Global Sex Trade, consisting of several members of Parliament, stood up in a House of Commons debate in July 2018 calling for a ban on “prostitution websites.”

They are also mulling the “Nordic Model,” in which selling sex is not illegal, but buying sex is. Ireland instituted this model in 2017, and immediately saw an uptick in violence against sex workers.

“People who are doing the worst of crimes are not deterred at all by this law,” says Kate McGrew, director of the Sex Workers Alliance of Ireland. “People see us as even more outside society, as vulnerable, as even less likely to call gardai or draw attention.”

Notably, the internet has increased the opportunities available for sex workers to operate in a safe environment. Some perform ‘cam work’ from home. They have no physical interaction with clients and are able to remain anonymous. Others sell video content and make passive income. Those who indulge in more ‘traditional’ prostitution, use social media to share information. For instance, they can notify their counterparts about violent clients or dangerous places.

The internet is an expression of freedom. It can’t be controlled, no matter how hard we try. Arguably, the FOSTA – SESTA bill is a form of political point scoring and a lazy way of trying to solve the big problem of sex trafficking. All it will do is increase the demand for underground sites which act as modern-day sex trafficking networks. The police should be trained on how to detect sex trafficking victims and establish rehabilitation programs to heal any emotional abuse or addiction.

Another issue is that the FOSTA – SESTA bill and any variations of it implemented around the world, is trying to limit a complex industry. For instance, some escort agencies, such as gentlemen4hire, strictly provide companionship. However, they are likely to be affected if such a bill was to be passed in the U.K.

There is a trend of governments trying to control the internet. In extreme cases, popular sites are banned. However, the internet is the exchange of information. People always find a way around it, Moreover, there are dark web sites which harbor all kinds of illegal activities. If governments truly care about stopping sex trafficking, they should train their police departments on how to detect and rehabilitate victims. They should also educate people on the tactics used by pimps and the effects it can have on one’s life. The FOSTA – SESTA bills are an ineffective bandage on a complex societal injury.

In conclusion, the passing of such bills has wide-reaching implications. Could businesses lobby to have other internet bills passed in order to protect their interests? This could open the floodgates to a world of scrutiny, and control over our lives – and perhaps that is the end goal. So, we need to take a deeper look into the issue of sex trafficking. Moreover, sex trafficking victims need to be listened to as they are best informed about how it works. Instead of trying to place a ban on sex work, more needs to be done to protect the vulnerable.

Comment


February 2019 Media Recommendations

February 28th, 2019

The brevity of February always throws me off. All my bills are due at the end of the month, and February is the one month that I’ll be late on a bill (or forget to pay one in its entirety, oops). So it’s not surprising that the month is almost over, and I’ve yet to post this (recent concerns over my cat’s health don’t help).

But it’s February 2019, damn it, so this still counts.

To be honest, the short month is only one reason why I didn’t consume a lot of media about sex. However, I had a few ideas in mind that I could have included from last month.. if only I could remember them! I need to use a spreadsheet, y’all. Still, there are a few things I’d like to recommend.

Listen

I usually focus on sexuality topics when I write these posts, but there’s always room for a little love, right? I came across a suggestion for This American Life’s podcast about breakups last month. It’s a long one, so you might need several sittings to finish it. In this episode, the hosts talk to a few different people about the heartbreaks they’ve experienced and, in some cases, are currently experiencing. It’s incredibly comforting in its way. Heartbreak can feel so solitary, yet we’ve all been through it, and this podcast reminds us of that. Plus, Phil Collins makes an appearance.

Sunny Megatron talked to Midori for an episode of American Sex about communication and negotiation, and it was enlightening — even if you’re not into kink.

Watch

This TEDx talk by Dr. Lisa Diamond prompts the audience to analyze whether it’s a good thing to view sexual orientation as something with which we’re born or if it’s potentially harming the very people who it was intended to protect. In some ways, she counters whether this is just a biological essentialist argument for orientation. I shared the article on my Facebook page, where it was a little divisive. While I’m not ready to fully agree with Dr. Diamond, I appreciate that she got me thinking.

Read 

I’ve just started Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight for Sex Workers’ Rights, which I will eventually review. I’m glad to include more writing about sex workers on my bookshelf; although, I’m not far enough to give my full opinion.

Another book that I recently read for review is Tongue Tied: Untangling Communication in Sex, Kink, and Relationships. I wasn’t intended on reading the book until I heard an interview of Stella Harris, the author, on American Sex that had me intrigued. Review coming soon!

Sex, Lies, and Pharmaceuticals: How Drug Companies Plan to Profit from Female Sexual Dysfunction by Ray Moynihan and Barbara Mintzes isn’t on my review list, but it is a book that falls squarely within my interests, and I will likely write a review here when I’ve finished it. It’s an interesting look at how big pharma wants to medicate female sexual dysfunction, which may not at all be dysfunction and simply a misunderstanding of the variations of sexuality. I definitely find myself skeptical about some of their views, but the book highlights some inner works of the medical and pharmaceutical industries that I wasn’t previously aware of.

Let me know if you’ve read, watched, or listened to any of these media. What did you think? Do you have any recommendations for me? Sound off in the comments!

4 Comments