
Good Vibes Radiant Rose
$48.99
from Babeland
Babeland and Good Vibes previously sold this toy under the One brand, (not to be confused with PlusOne; The One appears to be a brand specifically for Babeland/GV). You can still get it as part of the One Threeway bundle, but separately, it’s sold as the GV Radiant Rose. That’s what I’ll call it in this review.
We’re not going to talk about why it took so long for me to write and post this review, but we can talk about why it took me so long to write about any rose toy. It’s not just that they’re super trendy, although the strong marketing campaigns of what were clearly white-label toys left me feeling so inundated that it was surely part of the reason. In a world chock-full of fake reviews on social media and product listings, it’s become harder than ever to tell whether a toy is a complete piece of crap that looks nice.. or is actually worth trying. I couldn’t navigate that world before the One brand showed up from a store that I trust, so I decided to give it a try.
But the main reason I wasn’t interested in rose toys prior to this is that suction toys have thus far failed to do anything for me. I don’t know how much my anatomy plays a role, but it definitely doesn’t mesh with my style of masturbation, which centers around pressure. I’d only tried a couple of brands, but was so underwhelmed that I wasn’t interested in trying any more. The Radiant Rose offers vibrations as well as suction, so I thought that might make a difference.
And it did.
But not the way I expected.
I tried the Radiant Rose with suction and vibration separately and then both together. Overall, I found it to be incredibly overwhelming when using vibrations, which center directly around your clit if it’s in the suction hole (although you don’t have to use it that way for vibes alone; it’s certainly intended that way). When you turn on the toy and look into the hole for the clitoris, you can see the thin membrane of silicone move with the vibration. It’s rather aggressive, in my opinion—uncomfortable and sometimes painful. I’m someone who tends to stimulate the whole vulva area with less direct clitoral stimulation, and I found myself unconsciously pulling my body away from the toy or clenching to avoid the aggressive vibration of the silicone itself and not the body of the toy. For those who require direct clitoral stimulation, this might be a godsend, however.
Because the silicone itself vibrates, I find it difficult to describe the nature of the vibrations. They’re neither super buzzy nor deep, and will likely be plenty strong enough for many people. But the experience is so different that you almost need to throw what you know about vibrators out the window.
On the other hand, the vibrations overwhelmed the suction when using them simultaneously. Suction tends to be a little more understated, and it just couldn’t compete with the vibrations. So even if you love both functions, I’m not sure that using them at the same time is an improvement over using one or the other. I also don’t think that the single button makes a lot of sense with multiple types of stimulation. Surely there should be at least two buttons!
And when it comes to the suction. I was again underwhelmed. I’m not sure if it’s a good fit for me, although I’m positive the recommendation to use lube is supposed to help it work with a variety of bodies. You might recall that suction toys initially came with multiple nozzles to find the best fit. Because there’s no nozzle, removable or otherwise, the Radiant Rose might not work for everyone. In an economy like this, people might not want to risk the sale price of $48.99, let alone the full price of $69.99. And that’s totally understandable.
Aside from the vibrations and suction, I didn’t find the toy to be particularly comfortable to use or hold. The short rose design was hard on my fingers. If you like the stimulation and can hold it with a featherlight touch, this might not be an issue for you. The vibrations also easily transferred to my hands, which is always annoying. And I didn’t find it easy to locate the button with my fingers during use. I had to remove
Placement can also be an issue. Because the entire face of the rose gets placed against the vulva, it’s possible that it might be too large to comfortably fit between some labia and below the mons pubis, especially if your clitoris sits higher. If that sounds like your anatomy, you might prefer a suction toy with only a smaller nozzle that touches your body.
I’m also surprised at the aesthetics of the rose toy. The box recommends using it with lube, as I would generally also recommend, but it ignores the sharp ridges created by the petals, which include some deep and difficult-to-clean crevices if you get any lube or bodily fluids in it (the suction part itself does not open directly into the toy like some of Satisfyer’s older styles; it’s completely covered in silicone). This is a laughably bad design choice that nearly all the rose toys use, likely because many of them are private label toys made from the same exact molds. There is one rose toy that somewhat tackles this issue with a removable nozzle for cleaning and rounded petal edges that are less likely to collect gunk, and it’s made by Lovehoney. I wish Good Vibes would head in that direction for hygiene purposes.
Despite the silicone sheath, the Radiant Rose is only splash-proof, not waterproof. That means you’ll have no trouble washing it (and you’ll likely need running water to wash out the ridges), and you can take it into the shower without worry. But do not submerge it.
One thing I do appreciate is that it’s magnetic. It’s magnetic, and it works with other magnetic chargers, which I discovered when I had to use a Fun Factory (RIP) charger because I wasn’t sure where the charger that came with it was. Magnetic chargers may be all cross-compatible as long as the contact points line up, which would be great. I hate how many proprietary cables I’ve collected. Anyway, has anyone made a charging mat for multiple magnetic toys yet? Or do these work with a car’s Qi charger? If not, someone should get on that. Give me royalties for the idea, though! Charging is super fast with a magnetic charger that plugs directly into an outlet like that, but the original charging cable, which I have since found, has a standard USB plug on the other end with no adapter/block, which explains why I tossed it aside initially. The product is designed to offer 45 minutes of use after 90 minutes of charging. That’s.. yikes. Quite the ratio. But it’s likely because it has two functions.
I also realized that this brand isn’t consistent with charging styles. The Wand uses a standard charger that you plug into a port on the end of the toy, and the Flicker vibe and rabbit have magnetic contact points that are closer together than the points on the rose, so you can’t use the same cables (but the cables those come with seem identical to those that come with some other white label vibrators).
In contrast, the rose sits vertically on a little charging disc, like the much smaller evolution of the Form 2. The idea is that you’d keep it prominently in its place on your nightstand–if you liked it, of course. Many nightstands and lamps, including my new one, have USB ports, so I could do that. The magnetic connection is surprisingly strong, but it wouldn’t be impossible for you or a pet to knock the rose off its base or for the whole thing to fall off a surface, even though there’s a small silicone or rubber dot on the underside, ostensibly to keep it in place.
I know that it seems like I’ve talked about how this toy charges more than how it works. But treating charging connections and cables as an afterthought rather than a cohesive part of the overall brand strategy isn’t good for the reputation (and is one of the complaints I had about Funzze toys). It says that cutting costs or getting product sold quickly is more important than being consistent and reliable and respecting the consumer. It’s a reflection of the overall market and of individual brands. It’s also something that I am sure few people are talking about, which is a shame. It matters.
And the lack of respect for buyers is why it’s so hard to make heads or tails of the sheer number of rose toys out there. It’s why I can’t really say whether this is a good or bad toy compared to others, because there are so many nearly identical toys – including the Inya rose that Babeland also carries. It’s impossible to tell if they’re actually the same on the inside. And in the broader scheme, there’s a bunch of seemingly attractive vibrators that are super weak and slipshod in design. Once upon a time, a toy’s appearance gave you some information about its value and performance, but it’s become too easy to make attractive toys that perform poorly.
The best I can say is, sure, if you’re interested in the rose and suction toys have typically worked for you (or you have reason to think they might), and you can get it on sale and won’t regret the price if it doesn’t work for you, then give it a go. I just don’t feel like I can strongly promote it.
I didn’t mean this to turn into a rant, but we’re in a vastly different Internet than when I first started this blog. A lot of people have come and gone, and a lot of information seems to have been forgotten.. even if the websites that contain it still exist. There are people falling for fake reviews on Amazon listings for $15 toys that might not be made of body-safe materials, and that’s… just the norm now.
While nothing I say will stop people from making — or buying — white label sex toys, and I realize that everyone who wants to remain relevant has to hop on the trends and compete with bottom-dollar Chinese manufacturers, I do wish a brand like Good Vibes/Babeland hadn’t sunk to that level. How do you navigate a market that’s 99% crap, and you can no longer trust the brand names or signals that once hinted at quality?
Things are definitely not coming up roses.
It’s still masturbation May, and I am here to give you the first sex toy review in over two years and my first dual stimulator review since 2018 if you count the ridiculous toy Gvibe 2. Otherwise, you need to head way back into the archives to 2014 to find any sort of traditional rabbit vibrator (and it’s actually a butterfly).
Do you all remember the last time I wrote about air suction toys? I’ll forgive you if you don’t. It’s been almost four years! And I wasn’t particularly impressed, so I didn’t write a raving review. I quietly figured these toys weren’t for me until just recently. I figured that maybe the technology had improved, my body had changed, or I had simply used cheaper toys the first time around. This time, I was going to try a premium toy by Womanizer, one of the first companies to make clitoral suction toys, and Lovehoney. That’s how I wound up with the InsideOut, a dual stimulator that combines internal vibrators with clitoral suction, in my hands.
Womanizer X Lovehoney InsideOut
$149.99
from Lovehoney
This toy doesn’t look like ye old rabbit vibrators, of which I tried quite a few before eventually backing away, too. I am sensing a theme here. The InsideOut does look quite bulky due to the clitoral stimulator. And the shaft, while described as for G-spot stimulation, doesn’t have any texture or much contouring. There’s a very similar toy, the Duo, with a shaft that looks a bit more interesting.
This toy doesn’t come charged like so many, so I had to charge it. It’s interesting because the charging light is inside the toy and easy to miss. It turns green when charging and appears red when powered on, making no sense because the nozzle blocks the light. What a strange and unhelpful design choice!
So how is it in use?
The InsideOut runs into the same problems that separately plague both dual stimulators and suction toys: no two bodies are exactly alike. It’s why so many reviewers quickly gave up on rabbit vibrators. It’s also why Womanizer sends multiple nozzles with its toys. InsideOut came with two to ensure the best fit.
My first go ’round with the InsideOut was a bit ill-advised. I was clearly not aroused enough. I didn’t use enough lube–or perhaps the wrong kind, and the thin shaft felt.. pokey. Furthermore, while I never felt like I got the proper seal, the suction was uncomfortable and overwhelming. I figured I’d give it a second go in the future.
A few erotica stories later with my body more aroused, I was ready to give this toy a second shot. This time, I used a thicker lube, and the shaft of the InsideOut was much more comfortable.
I am happy to report that the base, which initially seemed quite bulky, does effectively rest atop my thighs if I want a hands-free experience. If this toy works for you, you can sit back and let the toy do the work. In this position, the buttons face up, which makes them accessible but not viewable to me. I do wish the buttons were more distinct, both from the rest of the toy and from each other–each function has a + and – button, and you can operate the functions separately. The + buttons are raised, but the – buttons are inset and difficult for my fingers to find easily. The diamond layout also makes it a bit harder to discern which set of buttons I’m pushing.
I still find the general shape of the shaft to be rather bland. I think this was exacerbated by the fact that this toy is supposed to be all “Set it and forget it.” Womanizer highlights the contact-less usability of these dual stimulators. Still, I’ve always liked pressure and motion, both of which are limited with the InsideOut just as they are like Lelo’s Ora and most rabbit vibrators. If you move the external portion too much, you break the seal. Although, I have to admit that I never achieved the sort of seal that I was expecting with either of the nozzles. They’re easy to swap out and remove for cleaning, however.
Furthermore, the suction of this toy is ridiculously, distractingly loud. Like, I can’t believe it made it through quality control. I would have sent someone back to the drawing board. We’re not talking Hitachi levels of volume, but you can’t hear the vibrations at all when the suction is on. Combined with the fact that the vibrations are quite weak and buzzy, even on maximum, and this isn’t a good look. I honestly had to turn off the suction to even tell if the vibrations were on.
Once aroused, I no longer found the clitoral suction overwhelming. In fact, at points, I found it to be the exact opposite, perhaps due to me preferring pressure. And while the shaft was no pokey, it didn’t do much, and it still felt uncomfortably.. long? It’s only 4.5 inches long, but it’s so narrow, and you need to ensure the base is lined up properly, too. It didn’t just completely miss my G-spot, it targeted my cervix like an expert swordsman (I guess, I’m no medieval princess) and left me a bit crampy afterward.
Now, it might be due to the distance between my clitoris and vaginal opening, which requires me to insert the toy full to make contact externally. The base of the toy runs more parallel to my body than perpendicular. Some people with a shorter distance might be able to bend the shaft more, which means the base would be at more of an angle. But then I imagine you’d have to force the shaft against the back wall of your vagina, and that would be uncomfortable, too. I just want something a little plusher and more filling.
Anyway, by the end, I managed to get myself off. Not hands-free, of course. I rocked the base as much as possible against my body to get the pressure that I needed, but my orgasm was all due to my own efforts and not because of anything the toy brought to the table. If that’s going to be the case, I might as well reach for a standard vibrator.
Despite every effort by Lovehoney and Womanizer, the InsideOut doesn’t manage to avoid the pitfalls of a dual stimulator. Indeed, it actually manages to make them a bit worse because you don’t simply need to press a bullet against your clitoris, you need to line up the nozzle perfectly.
This doesn’t mean that InsideOut won’t work for anyone. In fact, many people might have bodies that are just more receptive to what this toy does, and hopefully, those people who you (or don’t) will stumble across this review and find it helpful.
Satisfyer Pro 2, Pro Penguin and 2
$49-$69
from Of Sex and love Store
I’m a little late on this whole pulsating-air-clitoral-stimulator craze. To be honest, I wasn’t super interested. I’m not typically a direct clit stim girl, usually preferring a broader/rounder sort of stimulation on my entire vulva. And the toy that came out first, well, it has a terrible name (Womanizer).
But when the Satisfyer company contacted me about a review, I said “Sure.” I didn’t expect much, to be honest. So when three different models (Satisfyer Pro 2, Satisfyer Penguin and Satisfyer 2) showed up, I was pretty excited at having the chance to compare them. And when I realized that I didn’t really know how they worked, so I quickly stuck my fingers in the holes to see.
Oh.em.gee.
The sucking mechanism (or pressure wave, if you will) of the Satisfyer toys immediately seemed like something that would feel good. Amazing. God-like.
And maybe it is — just not for me. In order to enjoy any of the Satisfyer toys, you should probably enjoy direct clitoral stimulation. As I mentioned above and in a plethora of reviews, I am not that sort of person. Ultimately, I wound up feeling aroused, adjusting to the suction, turning each toy all the way up and.. waiting. Before awkwardly grinding against the body of the toy to get off.
Suction alone just isn’t enough to get me off. I don’t think this concept marries well with my style of masturbating.
But let’s back up.
All the Satisfiers are devices with hard plastic shells. There’s something of a nozzle on the head, into which a silicone piece slips. This leaves a hole that you place over your clitoris, or potentially nipple, and suction comes from within the device in steady pulses. This direct stimulation is going to be too much for some people to handle, and there’s not really a way to dial it back like you might by using a vibratnig through underwear or clothing. All three toys are waterproof, but I don’t use toys in water.

Satisfyer 2, cousin to a thermometer?
The Satisfyer 2 is, by far, the most medicinal-looking of the models. Someone might easily mistake one of these toys for an ear thermometer if they saw it sitting in your bathroom and didn’t actually handle it. You might think this makes it the least sexy of all the Satisfyer devices, but I actually think this title should be left to the Satisfyer Pro Penguin because its animal shape make me feel.. weird.

Never before have animal shapes bothered me on a sex toy
This model is definitely longer and wider (at the head) than either the Pro Penguin or Satisfyer Pro 2. The Pro 2 is definitely the newer, streamlined option. It’s less boxy and more ergonomic – and the gold-and-white color scheme is inverted. A note on the Satisyer Pro 2: there are two different versions available under the same name. If yours has the embossed name on the handle, it’s the newer model that also happens to be quieter than the old version.
If you use either the Satisfyer 2 or Pro 2, you can aim the handle toward your belly button to reach the buttons, which are on top. However, that placement feels awkward for me. I’ve rarely had a clitoral toy where this wasn’t the case, though. The Penguin is curvy and smaller, nearly fitting in my hand. If I turn it handle-up, I can use my thumb to reach the buttons that are technically on the underside of the toy, and this is the most comfortable usage for me. I might be alone in this.
Satisfyer 2 alone has three buttons: power, plus, and minus. The others simply have two, which I prefer, one for on/off and one for cycling through the settings. The Satysfier Pro 2’s buttons make quite the loud clicking noise in use.

Satisfyer Pro 2 has a curvier design and more plush nozzle
Each has a removable silicone head for ease of cleaning (you’re still going to want to wipe down the exterior and inner hole of the plastic, however). The silicone nozzle on the Satisfyer 2 is in between the Penguin and Satisfyer Pro 2 in terms of which. The Pro 2 is quite thick and wide like a donut. The Penguin has the thinnest and smallest nozzle. But the inner tubes are actually sized opposite, with the Penguin having the largest circumference, the Satisfyer 2 in the middle, and the Satisfier Pro 2 having the snuggest fit.

Nozzles of the Satisfyer Pro 2, 2 and Pro Penguins
The last way that the older Satisfyer model differs is in noise. It’s much louder than the other two, sounding akin to a small kitchen appliance. I think the Penguin is the quietest of the two, but the difference between it and the Satisfyer Pro 2 is less than the difference between either of those two and the Satisfyer 2.
The Satisfyer 2 is the only model that I received to try that ran on batteries — 2 AAAs. So it took a while for me to try it out because, apparently, it’s too much work to grab my already-charged batteries and insert them. Fortunately, the Satisfyer 2 works with rechargeables.
While I am not usually a fan of something that runs on AAAs, it seems like the suction mechanism of the Satisfyer toys isn’t decreased nearly as much vibrations do on a battery-operated toy. In fact, I think the Satisfyer 2 might be stronger than the Satisfyer Pro Penguin, and the motor does have the highest decibel rating of all the Satisfyer models, but it’s harder for me to discern power level between the toys and even between the levels on a single toy.
The Satisfyer comes with 11 levels, but I can’t really tell the difference. I can only confirm this by turning it all the way up and then backing down level by level. But to my clit or nipple, it’s not a huge difference. Once I get past the fourth level or so, they all feel pretty much the same. I think this is because the frequency of the suction has increased so much that it’s hard to differentiate between each pulse. As you can guess, I’m not thoroughly impressed by the different levels on the Satisfyer toys, and that’s how I feel about vibrators, too. 3-5 more distinct levels would be the better option here.
Although telling apart the toys via suction levels is difficult, it’s easier based on the way the size and shape of the silicone compartment feels. The silicone head of the Satisfyer Pro 2 is squishier, but the tube is also a tighter fit, making it easy to tell when it’s in place. The thinner silicone of the Penguin means you can more easily feel the rigid plastic behind it, but you can definitely feel that the inner chamber is wider. I think I like the shape and size of the silicone head of the Satisfyer 2 the best because it lands squarely in the middle in terms of squishiness and snugness.
But even having tried these three toys leaves me somewhat at a loss for words when it comes to recommending them. If you’ve never tried anything like the Satisfyer, I’m not sure how to compare it. I know you should like direct clitoral stimulation.
Nevertheless, it’s hard to recommend one of the specific models. The Satisfyer 2 and Penguin feel pretty similar suction-wise. If you were really opposed to batteries, I’d recommend the Penguin. It also feels the best in my hand.
It’s pretty difficult to recommend a toy based on head size/shape/angle, though. I think you just need to try them (I did, and I’m not sure if there’s one that I prefer). Unfortunately, Satisfyer doesn’t make their toys with multiple-sized heads like the competition, so I’d advise checking them out if you’re curious about size.
Satisfyer models are cheaper than the Womanizer, so it might be a safer bet if you’re not sure about the concept.
Dangerous Lilly has a fantastic comparison chart and write-up of the different Satisfyer and Womanizer models (which I have yet to try) on her blog. She also has photos of the various heads, which you’ll find helpful. We both seem to enjoy the Satisfyer 2 for what it’s worth.
I’m not sure I’ve ever come across a toy that was so difficult to recommend based on either experience or specs. That’s probably why so many people seem to have tried these or similar toys.
If you want to try any of the Satisfyers, you have plenty of options. They still sell the Pro 2 and Pro Penguin, although the Satisfyer 2 is no longer available.
Pink Pussy Pump
$37.69
from Store.OfSexAndLove.com
Although I was initially a bit put off by the strange looks of the Pink Pussy Pump, I was soon pleasantly surprised by the unique sensations provided by an actually effective suction system.
At first, I was taken aback by the size of the suction cup. I was expecting something a little smaller, for focus on clitoral suction. Rather, the cup provides suction stimulation to the entire vulva – or pussy – region. Furthermore, the cup is made of a hard pink plastic, which did prove to get the job done, but also threw me off. The hard plastic seemed to be a bit institutional or medicinal – at least, as medicinal as pink plastic can be. There’s not much to the rest of the apparatus: just a springy hose and a rubber, bulb-shaped pump. Overall, this is not a sexy looking sex toy and that was disappointing to my sense of aesthetic. Luckily, a toy does not need to be sexy itself to work well.
The pussy pump, which comes in a fairly cute, 70s inspired pink and purple box, fits easily over my lips. I have to agree that it is ergonomically correct; the edges of the cup are slightly curved instead of flat. Although the cup isn’t exactly small, it was small enough to move higher or lower and I think it would be wearable during sex as long as it’s not too rough or the cup isn’t bumped. I was able to insert a rather large toy and thrust without dislodging the cup.
Suction-wise, I was impressed. The Pinky Pussy Pump provided much more suction than the last flimsy toy I tried. I applied it to a bare thigh first, just to experiment, and the suction on the first pump was amazing. The increase in successive pumps was also impressive, and the effect on my skin was visible. Applied to my vulva, I felt a satisfying pressure/tug on the general area, which, while including my clit, wasn’t focused on it.
At first, my squeezes on the bulb pump, which is textured and easy to grip, were rather large, but I was able to experiment a bit, and I could easily adjust the level of pressure in fairly small increments. If the pressure is too much, you need to take off the pump quickly or you’re simply done playing, there is an easy to use quick-release button between the hose and pump. I found the woosh of air to my pussy to feel really exciting. I wasn’t able to release the pressure in increments as small as I could increase it but, with focus, I could release pressure in several small increments.
While this sensation alone wasn’t enough to get me off. It was quite arousing and would be a nice companion during sex or masturbation. I think sex would work a little better because the cup did get in the way a bit with toy use. The toy also aims to increase the size of your lips but, honestly, I didn’t really notice. However, I wasn’t as concerned because it was pleasurable.
Despite the fact that the suction was impressive, it was fairly easy to break the seal by slipping a finger under one edge of simply pulling the cup off my skin (and, y’know, when my cat jumped on me LOL). Neither of these things hurt, either. It also didn’t tug on any of my hair but it’s fairly short right now (maybe 1/2″).
One of the features of the Pink Pussy Pump is that you can remove the hose and pump without loosing suction. I’m not sure why anyone would do this. I wasn’t eager to do jumping jacks or the dishes or anything so I don’t see the need. Still, I tried it out, and I was able to successfully remove the house where it connects via a metal fastener type thing. This is also how I disconnected the hose to wash the cup before and after use. Without the hose, the cup is simply an easy-to-clean, hard plastic piece.
I found the Pink Pussy Pump to be more stimulating than I thought it would be and can see it being used during partner or solo play. The stretchy hose was adequate length for me to use on myself and a partner could easily hold the reins as well, adding another aspect to your play. I would recommend this to anyone looking for suction in their sex lives.