Don’t Love Your Hitachi? Try An Attachment

March 11th, 2020

I may be the only person in the world who doesn’t love the toy formerly known as the Hitachi Magic Wand (now the Magic Wand Original). I simply prefer my wand head to be more cylindrical than spherical, so I have an edge to press against my body. I traded away a Magic Wand some time ago, but I cannot help but wonder if I was, perhaps, too quick to do so.

You see, while the shape of the wand itself might not have done anything for me, there are quite a few attachments that make the toy more versatile. In fact, even if you love your Magic Wand, you might benefit from one of these accessories (look for silicone if you want a safe and easy-to-clean sex toy material).

G-Spotters

There’s no dearth of G-spot attachments for the Magic Wand and similar toys. They insert, typically, with a curved shaft that is slightly bulbous or wider toward the end. Depending on how you would hold the Magic Wand against your clitoris, you might need to adjust the angle to make contact with your G-spot. But when you do? Those powerful vibes can rock you from the inside out.

Clitoral Attachments

Now, all wand vibes work as clitoral stimulators out of the box, but perhaps you find them too powerful most of the time or dislike the shape as I did. There are a couple of clitoral attachments that flutter, similarly to bunny ears on rabbit vibes. One maker even has a suction-type clitoral attachment for the best of both worlds.

Cock Sleeves

Those of you with penises don’t have to miss out using the Magic Wand, either. Penis attachments typically consist of a stroker attachment that you can lube up and slip into. Although, I can imagine a spare hand might make the job a bit easier.

BYOD

I hope y’all can get on board with the idea of bringing your own dildo, because many of us would have much better sex if BYOD was the default. And there are Magic Wand attachments that enable you to secure your favorite dildo to the head of the wand, temporarily turning it into a vibrator.

Anal Beads

Although G-spotter can be used for anal and prostate stimulation, anal beads provide a sensation all their own. Fortunately, multiple companies have realized this and make Magic-Wand-compatible attachment.

Dual Stimulators

Some G-spotters might serve as dual stimulators if the shape is compatible with the distance between your vaginal opening and clitoris, but it’s not a guarantee. With one of these accessories, you can stimulate yourself inside and out, thanks to a larger external portion. Some are similar to rabbits, and others are hard to describe in words.

Triple Stimulators

Finally, there are toys that promise to offer all three types of stimulation simultaneously: vaginal, clitoral, and anal. They usually consist of an internal shaft, an external arm or nubs for clit stim, and an anal shaft/beads.

So, you can see why I might be just a bit sore that I didn’t give my wand more of a go before handing it off to someone else. Alas, it’s probably got a better life now.

Keep in mind that many wands have similar head sizes and shapes, which can make an attachment compatible with both Magic Wand and this Hitachi magic wand alternative in Australia, for example. But that’s not always the case.

Finding a compatible wand if you’re not based in the US can be frustrating. For readers in the UK, click here to check out the version that’s compatible with your outlets.

Comment


February 2020 Media Recommendations

February 28th, 2020

This month’s list of recommended media is short and sweet, partially because there wasn’t a lot of media that really spoke to me but partly because those pieces that did speak to me are just so damned incomparable.

First up, we have The Vagina Bible, a tome of a book by OGBYN Jen Gunter who wants to provide medically accurate information to anyone who owns a vagina — and a vulva. You’ll learn more about the specifics in an upcoming review, but it contains a wealth of information that is certainly useful but rarely taught.

The second recommendation is an incredibly powerful and provoking episode of Sluts and Scholars about victims’ rights laws with Norma Buster, the client relations manager at the C.A. Goldberg Victims’ Rights Law Firm and a survivor of revenge porn. It’s a hard listen, and I’ve never been a victim of such heinous actions, so I advise listening with caution. It’s frustrating to learn about the world that cares so little for women, who are so often the victims of such incredible invasions of safety and privacy. But it’s inspiring to learn about those people who are working so diligently to turn the tide.

 

Comment


Bijoux Indiscrets cosmetics for better sex

On The Internet, Privacy, And Our Children

January 28th, 2020

A couple of weeks ago, someone shared something in one of the Facebook groups to which I belong. Unfortunately, i have lost the post, but I can sum it up and why it set the gears in my head a-grindin’.

The post was a screencap of a tweet, written by a parent who had just informed their daughter that periods will repeat monthly for several decades. The daughter responded negatively. The overall tone was humorous and, as someone who has sometimes struggled with periods, I could relate. It wasn’t my first time viewing the tweet, and I was ready to scroll on by until I saw why the image had been shared to the group.

I believe the reason why this post was shared was to point out how potentially embarrassing it could be for an adolescent to have their parent share with the internet. Although it wasn’t explicitly stated that this is the case, one could reasonably assume so. It wasn’t the point of the tweet, which was to be funny, but the information was still provided with it.

The group’s response was torn. Because the majority of the members were left-leaning women, many made the argument that there is no shame about periods. So what if we talk about it? If someone knows that a person with a uterus is experiencing a normal bodily function?

On the one hand, I completely agree. There is no shame about periods, at least, they shouldn’t be. It’s not always so cut and dry, unfortunately.

But there is an element here that isn’t so much about the content but the privacy of this girl There’s no shame about her period, but it should be her choice what strangers know about her, and this has become an increasingly complicated issue thanks to the popularity of the Internet and social media. You can so easily reach people, but this also means that it’s difficult to know who knows what about you and what the intentions of those people are.

20 years ago, I had my very first website, a simple one-page, HTML-based profile that came with my WBS chat account. Since then, I’ve created dozens of websites and several blogs. I’ve shared myself freely with the Internet. Occasionally, someone would express concern over how freely.

But I wasn’t alone. Before blogs became avenues toward careers, were viewed as legitimate forums to discuss politics or inform the masses about the dangers of certain sex toy materials, or became this grown-up thing, they were almost always personal. And they were, on the whole, owned by preteen and teenaged girls like myself who were all talking about themselves unabashedly, finding community and acceptance, which was sometimes lacking in the face-to-face world.

We’ve come a long time since then, and I still talk to some of those people. Only, we’re not teenagers anymore. Many of them have become parents, and while few of us have blogs that we keep up with anymore, most remain active on social media.

I read the posts wherein people discuss their kids: pregnancy announcements, births, milestones, rewards, and frustrations included. It’s easy to upload a few photos or a video to Facebook and share with the entire extended family. For the most part, these posts are charming, sometimes funny, and typically appropriate. But sometimes they seem to ignore boundaries and step over lines. I wonder how these children will feel when they themselves become teenagers, and then adults, and stumble across what their parents have shared about them, how they’ve been bared to the world without their knowledge or consent. I wonder how it would feel that near and sometimes complete strangers know such intimate details.

So I understood why that tweet rubbed some people wrong. There’s a lack of awareness and an influx of attention that can lead to, what seems to be, poor judgment when it comes to sharing about your child online.

But the Internet did not start this. It only makes it easier to reach more people. Parents have revealed details that their children would prefer remain private since the dawn of time (I can only assume).  I know because mine did, and aside from remaining frustrated about it to this day, the subject is actually relevant to this blog.

I lost my virginity when I was 18 to a boyfriend who I had met online (through a forum about a movie we both enjoyed, not an adult dating site as we were both still minors). I was living with a friend at the time, and he flew from Texas to visit me. Sexuality had been an important part of our online relationship and continued to be once we met in person. That we would have sex wasn’t a question, and the whole experience was generally positive. We would go on to get married, and I would create Of Sex and Love.

In the immediate aftermath of this, however, I was excited, giddy, serene. In short, I was experiencing happiness like I never had before. I had never thought it was even possible if I am being honest.

At the time, my relationship with my mother was strained, as it often is. But I wanted to share this with her. As my friend drove away from the airport after dropping off my ex, I called my mother. I wanted to reconnect and to share the way that daughters do with mothers, at least, they do in the movies.

But the conversation I had was a disappointing one. My mom didn’t pick up on this. What she did do was ask if we’d had sex. I answered honestly, but that wasn’t relevant in my mind. It wasn’t the purpose of that call.

I hung up, dejected. My mom and I didn’t reconnect then. In fact, things even got a little worse.

A few weeks later, I ran into my aunt. She had seen my mom in the interim. As I chatted with my aunt, she informed me that, upon walking into my mom’s house, the first thing my mom said was that I was no longer a virgin.

Now, this was years before the advent of any social media that my mom would use, and I doubt she would have said something like that online, but I still felt hurt that she was discussing my private matters without my consent. I may talk about these things and certainly to more people than just my aunt, but that’s my right, not hers.

It didn’t just sting; I felt a sense of betrayal that added on to my prior disappointment. My relationship with my mother wouldn’t improve anytime soon.

So it’s certainly not the fault of the Internet when people run their mouths that would be better left closed. People have poor judgment, even when those people are parents. They are not infallible. But those of us who strive to be better have a responsibility to at least try to be more conscientious than that, to respect privacy and boundaries, and to be aware of the impact of our words. And in a hyperconnected world, this is all the more important.

While there are things such as periods or sex that I believe we need to talk about more than we do and in smarter ways than we do, when these things pertain to specific people, those people must be involved in those conversations voluntarily.

Maybe the daughter in question from that tweet knew. Maybe she was okay with it or didn’t care either way. But as long as there’s doubt, we have work to do.

Comment


December 2019 Media Recommendations + 2019 Wrapup

December 31st, 2019

This month’s new media recommendations are all podcasts; although, there is some other media types to check out in my 2019 wrapup.

Dr. Lehmiller has made the rounds discussing his survey about sexual fantasies, but his spot on NPR’s What We Do was one of the best interviews about it, no doubt in part to the skilled host.

Another NPR podcast, Planet Money, ventured into the billion-dollar sperm bank industry.

Check out this episode of Sex Out Loud featuring Tina Horn, who discusses making comics about sexual freedom (in a way that I hope isn’t a bad omen) Then, check out SFSX.

Finally, in this episode of Speaking Out Loud, the Pleasure Mechanics tackle the myth of the hymen.

2019 Wrapup

I also wanted to highlight some of the media I consumed over 2019 that have stayed with me. The best books have already been linked in my “Best of 2019” post, so this focuses on podcasts and video content.

In one of the last episodest56 of the apparently-defunct Science of Sex podcast, Joe and Dr. Zhana interviewed PhD candidate Christina Parreira who actually worked in a brothel.

Science Vs broke down whether the fertility cliff is real.

Speaking of Lehmiller, he interviewed Ari Tuckman about his book ADHD After Dark. They discuss the very real ways ADHD can play out in sex and relationships.

Outward’s episode about bi culture has stuck with me in subtle ways, even if I don’t remember any particular quotes.

Another episode from Science Vs that was an amazing and emotional listen is The Abortion Underground.

love how Sex Ed School teaches kids about sex in realistic, age-appropriate, and fun ways. This would never fly in the US, which is so frustrating, but perhaps some educators will find these videos helpful.

Unladylike dove into the rise (and fall) of lesbian bars around the world.

I grew so much respect for Amber Heard when she was on Sluts & Scholars.

I’m so glad that I received an email about Something Positive for Positive People. Courtney tackles the issue of herpes in a way that I can only hope to emulate. I particularly recommend episode 92.

You all know how much I love learning about the science of sex, so my mind was blown when I heard Nicole Krause talk about research I’d never heard of on American Sex.

The 8-part podcast Sold In America is about selling sex is amazing.

And if you prefer visual content, Philosophy Tube’s episode about sex work was highly-regarded and for good reason!

Although not about sex, I really enjoyed the episode of Freakonomics featuring Geena Davis, who talked about Hollywood’s princess problem.

I’d also like to recommend the audiobooks of the LOTR series as narrated by Ron Inglis. They were so good!

If you click no other links, you absolutely must check out the free series Mercy Mistress on YouTube. Based on the memoirs by Mistress Yin, it’s a lovely, erotic, and more realistic take on BDSM than we’re used to.

Finally, my readers should check out the nerdiness that is this American Sex podcast with erotica writer and tabletop gamer Shanna Germain.

 

Comment


The Best and Worst of 2019

December 30th, 2019

In previous years my best — and worst of — lists included multiple sex toys. In 2019, I reviewed mostly books and not that many of them. So you’ll find a handful of them on this list along with only one sex toy!

Turned On Science, Sex and Robots

Sex meets tech in this entertaining and informative book by Kate Devlin

The first book I’ll recommend is Revolting Prostitutes, which examines the different legal frameworks and how those affect sex workers. It also explains how sex workers’ rights are ultimately women’s rights. If you want to learn more about how legalizing or decriminalizing sex work plays out, this is the book for you!

While I wasn’t intending to review Screwed, it wound up being a fast read that I enjoyed as well as a compelling argument that looked into the ways that society fails women when it comes to sex.

I thought I knew a lot about the menstrual cycle, but Heavy Flow explained some things that weren’t quite clear and helped paint a picture of menstruation as part of the larger picture and a person’s life and not just compartmentalized, relegated to exist only for 4-7 days out of the month.

If you want to know the state of sex robots and contemplate what this means for you, then I cannot recommend Turned On enough. It’s witty and wise and truly enjoyable to read.

I only reviewed a few sex toys this year, and only one is worth recommending. The revamped Laya II is stronger than the first Laya II and allowed me to enjoy Fun Factory’s Laya line once more.

On the other hand, Vibease and its terrible audio erotica failed to please. And months later, I am still struggling to get Coochy Plus shaving cream out of the broken pump bottle it came in.

Interestingly, while I had a somewhat favorable opinion of Mimi Soft when I reviewed it at the beginning of the year, I actually forgot I even tried it. Oops!

 

1 Comment


Screwed: How Women Are Set Up to Fail at Sex

December 24th, 2019

You wouldn’t necessarily think that a book about how society sets women up to fail at sex would be fun, but you might be wrong. “Fun” may not even be the right word to described Screwed, but it was a real page-turner, and I found myself eager to pick it back up after a break and reluctant to put it back down. This was a surprise, considering that the book hadn’t even been on my radar before I picked it up.

Screwed would be a brisk read for anyone at fewer than 160 pages, of course. But the content within those pages is shrewd in its wisdom and well-timed, at least, as well-timed as it can be considering that not everyone has pondered these things before. Sex, while it can be great, is generally less good for women than men, especially when the desires and even consent of those women is ignored and when those women are not taught how to get what want — and deserve. Screwed tackles all of this.

The book is written by Lil Boisvert, a French-Canadian and host of the show Sexplora, a six-episode documentary, which is “thirty minutes of orgasmic television focused on sex and IQ.” Unfortunately for me, it’s in a mix of English and French, which I haven’t studied in over 15 years. Fortunately, Boisvert brings the same IQ to her Screwed.

Lili actively avoids staying into telling the reader what to do. There are plenty of resources that do this (including Becoming Cliterate and Better Sex Through Mindfulness). Screwed’s focus is how we got to where we are as a society and not how individual women must remedy that to (re)claim their sexualities. Lili Boisvert is transparent about this from the very start. Her warning prefaces the book, stating what it is not and what it is. That includes a note that the slant is heterosexual because it’s the different ways society handles sex in regard to men and women that is so often the problem.

With that in mind, Boisvert jumps out of the gate, explaining how sex in western society is something done for and originating with the man and being done to the woman. This, she says, is the “cumshot principle,” and she’ll references it many times before the end of the book. She quickly breaks down the different roles that we have been taught: how women are the gatekeepers of sex that they “possess,” how men must make the first move even as women seduce (and must be visually appealing to do so), how women must remain passive, and how women must simultaneously fend off unwanted interest and advances from men while also appearing receptive if they do not want to offend. Boisvert even breaks down how women are expected to act in the bedroom. From here, she segues to a reflection on how this impacts a woman’s libido — as the “prey,” she isn’t allowed to focus on her desires the way a man is. Of course, this all paves the way for rape culture, and the author wraps up the chapter with an analysis of that.

It might sound like this first chapter of Screwed covers a lot, but it set the foundation for all of the arguments that follow. Boisvert paints a picture of the cumshot principal and the hunter/prey dynamic as the string that ties the greater mistreatment of women’s sexuality together.

From here, Boisvert jumps into a critical examination of why young women are prizes the way they are, Cougar culture, and whether those arguments that these preferences are all based in biology hold any water. The author continues her forward charge as she takes on the idea that a woman/girl must be pure and that a sexually promiscuous woman is immoral. Boisvert even examines why other women contribute to slut-shaming, including policing the bodies of girls and women.

We’re halfway through the book, now, and Boisvert isn’t nearly finished. She moves from policing of bodies to the way that the sexes are segregated, starting with clothing and moving on the cosmetics, hair, and body hair. It’s here that she swings at feminity, itself a prison that keeps women objectified.

From there, the author deconstructs the very reasons why women, as a whole, cannot objectify men, as a whole. She argues that men are subjectified while women are objectified and examines the way this unfolds every day. Of course, Boisvert comments on how porn upholds these views.

Perhaps the most contentious claim that Boisvert makes comes in the next chapter, where she explains that women who engage in casual sex are not playing on an even playing field because of the way that women have been socialized to seek love and men sex, and everyone is taught that the other team is only out for their single-minded goal. Yet I do not disagree with the author’s reasoning; it’s absolutely true that we are taught these things. Yet, Boisvert breaks down how this is not actually the case, using science to back up her argument. But even when that isn’t the case, Boisvert continues, these lessons color our sexual interactions and often result in women getting less out of sex than men.

Boisvert is no more fired up than she is in the final chapter, perhaps her coup de grace. What might be the ultimate result of this uneven playing field? That’s right, the orgasm gap. The author rails against the continued prioritization of men’s pleasure over women’s and penis-centric sex, which can make many women wonder what’s wrong with them when they do not orgasm easily (or at all) from vaginal penetration. She takes umbrage with Freud’s persistent teachings that clitoral orgasms are lesser than vaginal ones, which has, perhaps, lead to an over-emphasis on finding and stimulating the G-spot. In this final chapter, Boisvert gives a brief anatomy lesson that so many people dearly need before neatly wrapping up the book with a reminder that advice for women to explore their bodies may be misguided until we deal with sexism in sexuality (and life) on a large scale.

I did not intend to summarize Screwed as I did, but the structure is thoughtful, and the argument only picks up more speed and becomes fiery as the book presses on. While the book isn’t especially long, Boisvert manages to be articulate and pragmatic about complex topics in a way that’s accessible without being too daunting or minimizing. It is a book I wound encourage my teenaged sister to read as she considers becoming sexually active and one that I would recommend to any feminists, not to mention a primer on why so many women find sex to be bad or, at the very least, disappointing.

There are very few things that I didn’t love about Screwed; one of them is the tagline. Women don’t fail at sex; society fails women when it comes to sex. and I think “How society fails women when it comes to sex” is just as pithy and perhaps less open to misinterpretation than the tagline we actually got. However, this is really a small thing to pick at when considering the book overall.

Secondly, I was a bit surprised that Boisvert didn’t take on the issue of spontaneous versus responsive desire more thoroughly. She could have if she wanted to. As it stands, she mentions it but perhaps not to the extent that would impress upon the reader how much it impacts sexual frustation between men and women. Perhaps this would treat too far into the territory of telling women what to do individually, rather than criticizing how society views sex. Unfortunately, Screwed doesn’t include a list of resources or recommended reads, but it wouldn’t hurt if it did.

Still, what Boisvert says in these pages remains valuable, and for many people, the book could open their eyes to these issues and start them on their journey to doing better, learning more, and having better sex, even if the intent of the book is to illustrate the way that women are collectively failed when it comes to sex.

1 Comment


Science of Sex: The Complexities of Herpes

December 21st, 2019

Herpes

The last Science of Sex is about herpes and, more specifically the two viruses and why it’s been so difficult for us to find a vaccine for an STI that’s become increasingly common, perhaps because people do not realize that it can be spread even when there’s no outbreak. Herpes is spread through skin contact, which makes it easy to pass or contract, similar to HPV. And while there are medications to prevent and suppress breakouts, which come in the form of sores, a vaccine would go a long way to prevent that need in the first place.

Most people know about herpes but may not fully understand it. First, there are two viruses: Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus 2. 6 million years ago, both viruses diverged from an ancestor.

While you may you may have been taught that HSV1 is “oral” herpes, that oversimplifies the subject. While HSV1 causes most cases of oral herpes, which 1 in 2 people have in the United States, those that give you cold sores, it can be transmitted to genitals through oral sex.

It’s possible for one person to have both viruses.

Furthermore, the two viruses like to mingle. It’s not uncommon for these viruses to mix, or recombine, and they’ve been doing this for some time. Most viruses of “genital” herpes contain DNA from oral herpes.

However, it’s possible for the two viruses to mix in new and unusual ways. A more recent study found a strain of HSV1 that contained ten times as much HSV2 DNA. The chunk was ten times larger than typically occurs. This particular mixture belonged to one patient who had genital infections of both HSV1 and HSV2 (known as co-infection) and the DNA mixed in that person specifically.

Interestingly, it always appears that genital herpes picks up chunks of data from oral herpes and not the other way around.

Aside from interesting, this could potentially be frustrating to researchers who want to create a vaccine for herpes. If they target HSV2 but the strain contains large chunks of HSV1 data or is able to swap out that DNA, the vaccine may not be effective.

Currently, we only have three antiviral medications available to treat existing herpes infections and no vaccine to prevent new infections. These medications enable people with herpes to live normal lives. However, there are times when herpes has led to recurrent keratitis, which can cause blindness, encephalitis, and other diseases, especially in people with compromised immune systems.

We may be closer to a vaccine than not, however. The company Excell Biotech is currently testing a herpes vaccine on animals with hopes to go into clinical trials next year. Another company, X-Vax, is looking into creating a herpes vaccine by altering the virus in an attempt to prompt the body to create a different type of antibody.

While one or both of these vaccines might prove dependable and come to market, it’s really too soon to tell. At least two previous attempts to make a herpes vaccine have failed. Last year, Genocea Biosciences abandoned their attempt at a herpes vaccine after a positive Phase II before heading to the next phase. Also in 2018, Vical gave up its attempt at a herpes vaccine after a failed trial.

Prior to that, a company attempting to create a vaccine against HSV2 actually found that the vaccine only protected against HSV1 in some cases. The way the two viruses mix could potentially explain that strange failure.

But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try, especially when teens might be at greater risk of contracting herpes than prior generations.

Further Reading

Comment